🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, states are investing massive amounts into what is known as “sovereign AI” – building domestic AI technologies. Starting with the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are racing to create AI that comprehends native tongues and cultural nuances.

The International AI Arms Race

This movement is an element in a larger international race dominated by major corporations from the United States and the People's Republic of China. While firms like a leading AI firm and Meta pour massive funds, mid-sized nations are additionally placing their own investments in the artificial intelligence domain.

However amid such vast amounts involved, is it possible for smaller states achieve notable benefits? As stated by an expert from a prominent policy organization, If not you’re a rich government or a large company, it’s quite a hardship to develop an LLM from scratch.”

Security Concerns

A lot of nations are reluctant to rely on foreign AI technologies. In India, for example, American-made AI tools have sometimes been insufficient. An illustrative instance featured an AI assistant deployed to teach students in a isolated village – it communicated in the English language with a thick Western inflection that was difficult to follow for native listeners.

Additionally there’s the state security dimension. For the Indian security agencies, relying on particular international systems is seen as not permissible. As one developer noted, It's possible it contains some random data source that might say that, for example, a certain region is outside of India … Utilizing that certain AI in a security environment is a big no-no.”

He further stated, I’ve consulted experts who are in defence. They wish to use AI, but, forget about particular tools, they prefer not to rely on Western technologies because details might go abroad, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

National Projects

Consequently, several nations are backing local projects. A particular such a effort is being developed in the Indian market, in which a company is striving to create a national LLM with state funding. This effort has dedicated roughly 1.25 billion dollars to artificial intelligence advancement.

The founder foresees a system that is less resource-intensive than top-tier tools from Western and Eastern firms. He states that the country will have to offset the financial disparity with talent. Based in India, we don’t have the advantage of pouring huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we contend against for example the enormous investments that the America is investing? I think that is the point at which the core expertise and the strategic thinking comes in.”

Regional Emphasis

In Singapore, a state-backed program is backing machine learning tools developed in the region's native tongues. These particular dialects – including Malay, the Thai language, the Lao language, Indonesian, the Khmer language and additional ones – are often poorly represented in Western-developed LLMs.

I wish the people who are developing these national AI models were aware of how rapidly and how quickly the leading edge is advancing.

An executive involved in the initiative says that these models are created to complement more extensive systems, instead of displacing them. Tools such as a popular AI tool and Gemini, he states, often struggle with native tongues and local customs – interacting in unnatural the Khmer language, as an example, or suggesting non-vegetarian dishes to Malay consumers.

Developing regional-language LLMs permits local governments to code in local context – and at least be “smart consumers” of a powerful tool developed elsewhere.

He continues, “I’m very careful with the term independent. I think what we’re attempting to express is we aim to be more adequately included and we wish to understand the abilities” of AI technologies.

International Collaboration

For states attempting to find their place in an escalating international arena, there’s an alternative: collaborate. Experts affiliated with a well-known policy school recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative distributed among a consortium of developing countries.

They call the proposal “Airbus for AI”, modeled after Europe’s effective initiative to build a rival to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. This idea would entail the formation of a public AI company that would pool the capabilities of various countries’ AI programs – including the UK, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a strong competitor to the Western and Eastern leaders.

The primary researcher of a report outlining the initiative notes that the idea has attracted the attention of AI officials of at least several nations to date, as well as several sovereign AI companies. While it is now targeting “developing countries”, emerging economies – Mongolia and Rwanda included – have also indicated willingness.

He elaborates, Currently, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s less trust in the promises of the present White House. People are asking such as, is it safe to rely on these technologies? Suppose they choose to